Just having a quick look and thought I would point something out. At a quick glance I notice that the civil service has miles and miles of people who seem to have earned an Honour.
Yet, for those to really serve the country, not many at all. I guess they do not earn it being out there under fire.
It must be hard work in those offices, earning so little with a pension that would hardly get you by......
I know where my heart is...
Thursday, 31 December 2009
Stephen Timms MP Writes in the Telegraph
Who pays inheritance tax
SIR – The Conservative Party’s claim about the number of people who are liable to pay inheritance tax is ludicrous (report, December 29). As the Chancellor said at the pre-Budget report, less than three per cent of estates will pay inheritance tax. Just 16,000 estates were liable for inheritance tax in 2008-2009.
The Tories fail to take into account that in 2007, the Chancellor doubled the threshold above which estates became subject to inheritance tax for married couples and civil partners. If you’re a widow who wants to leave something to your children and grandchildren, you won’t just have your own allowance but that of your husband, too. In such a case, the effective threshold for paying inheritance tax is not £325,000 but £650,000, four times the average house price. We consider this to be fair.
David Cameron is proposing an effective limit of £2 million, 13 times the average house price. The Tory claim that only millionaires would pay inheritance under their plans is misleading. Estates worth up to £2 million would pay nothing, the equivalent of a £540,000 tax break.
Instead of misleading the public, Mr Cameron should explain why he is so intent on giving a tax cut worth £200,000 to the 3,000 richest estates in the country.
Stephen Timms MP
Financial Secretary to the Treasury
London SW1
Now, let me think about this for a second. As he is Labour and I would think a socialist, why is he not calling for 100% inheritance tax? This would allow them to return everything back to the people, and everyone would be equal. Hmmm, me thinks they don't have the guts to even talk about doing something like that.
Now, what is wrong with inheritance tax? We are talking about taking away money from a family who has suffered a loss. Telling them that after they have paid for the funeral, lawyers and all the other things required, then you have to give them everything over, whatever amount it gets set at.
Why is it really needed? Why not up some other tax and allow people to pass on everything to their family? That family is going to continue to pay tax, and in the long run they would pay more tax, on interest earned money spent with the winfall, etc.
Labour, not thinking about you, thinking about how to control you....
SIR – The Conservative Party’s claim about the number of people who are liable to pay inheritance tax is ludicrous (report, December 29). As the Chancellor said at the pre-Budget report, less than three per cent of estates will pay inheritance tax. Just 16,000 estates were liable for inheritance tax in 2008-2009.
The Tories fail to take into account that in 2007, the Chancellor doubled the threshold above which estates became subject to inheritance tax for married couples and civil partners. If you’re a widow who wants to leave something to your children and grandchildren, you won’t just have your own allowance but that of your husband, too. In such a case, the effective threshold for paying inheritance tax is not £325,000 but £650,000, four times the average house price. We consider this to be fair.
David Cameron is proposing an effective limit of £2 million, 13 times the average house price. The Tory claim that only millionaires would pay inheritance under their plans is misleading. Estates worth up to £2 million would pay nothing, the equivalent of a £540,000 tax break.
Instead of misleading the public, Mr Cameron should explain why he is so intent on giving a tax cut worth £200,000 to the 3,000 richest estates in the country.
Stephen Timms MP
Financial Secretary to the Treasury
London SW1
Now, let me think about this for a second. As he is Labour and I would think a socialist, why is he not calling for 100% inheritance tax? This would allow them to return everything back to the people, and everyone would be equal. Hmmm, me thinks they don't have the guts to even talk about doing something like that.
Now, what is wrong with inheritance tax? We are talking about taking away money from a family who has suffered a loss. Telling them that after they have paid for the funeral, lawyers and all the other things required, then you have to give them everything over, whatever amount it gets set at.
Why is it really needed? Why not up some other tax and allow people to pass on everything to their family? That family is going to continue to pay tax, and in the long run they would pay more tax, on interest earned money spent with the winfall, etc.
Labour, not thinking about you, thinking about how to control you....
Damian Green MP - Return his DNA
If you are innocent of committing an offence the state should have no right to retain your DNA. I just cannot believe any intelligent person could think otherwise.
You can find more details and sign the petition.
You can find more details and sign the petition.
The British and Drinking
Soon it will be new year, and all the British will be out on the streets throwing up and pissing in nearest shop doorway. The joys of walking the British streets at night. Still, some shop owners will be able to take down the annual christmas boards they have to put up to protect their stores from the lovely British drunks walking the streets in December.
This problem could easily be solved by bringing the sale of booze into controlled shops. Bars/Pubs could no longer sell take away drinks, and the only place to buy a 6 pack would be the local beer store. The wine, from the local liquir store.
Then you have to fix the education system, wait 50 years until educated people start having children, and those children have children who are going to school, then you relax the rules abit.
But as long as you have 13 year olds popping out kids, and teenagers who are parents who have never finished school, and their kids will never finish school, you have a system that is broken and not fixable.
Unless you work like China, 1 child per family and you have to ask if you can have one.
Punishment, hmmmm, yes the british don't believe in that do they. They think saying sorry is good enough, and giving counciling to the victim. Its ok that your mugger is still walking the streets how do you feel about it, sorry I could not hear you through the bandages.
This problem could easily be solved by bringing the sale of booze into controlled shops. Bars/Pubs could no longer sell take away drinks, and the only place to buy a 6 pack would be the local beer store. The wine, from the local liquir store.
Then you have to fix the education system, wait 50 years until educated people start having children, and those children have children who are going to school, then you relax the rules abit.
But as long as you have 13 year olds popping out kids, and teenagers who are parents who have never finished school, and their kids will never finish school, you have a system that is broken and not fixable.
Unless you work like China, 1 child per family and you have to ask if you can have one.
Punishment, hmmmm, yes the british don't believe in that do they. They think saying sorry is good enough, and giving counciling to the victim. Its ok that your mugger is still walking the streets how do you feel about it, sorry I could not hear you through the bandages.
For the last time, how to quit smoking and save the health care...
Hello my wonderful readers, I would just like to try one more time to put across an idea that would work.
Lord only knows no one will see the sence in this, even when it is spelt out, but this is england where you can leave Uni and not be able to count to 10.
Health Care, the NHS and Smoking. You know what I mean, you see the ads as a cost of millions to stop you smoking, the packs they will send through the post the special people to assist you in quitting, lets try this on for size.
Part 1 - You make cigarettes a prescription only.
(This means no new smokers can start without a Doctors say so, and you guarantee the money and prices, you also stop underage smoking because of the prescription drug laws, and you give the police another easy target. Your smoking sir, can I see the prescription for those cigarettes.)
Part 2 – Every 6 months a chest x-ray is required and your doctor gives you another prescription for cigarettes, but if they see a spot, and catch cancer early, you have to quit and you cannot get any cigarettes legally again.
What this does it, brings all the money for cigarettes into the health care system. Allows you to control smokers and who is smoking and guarantees money into the health care system.
You could two part the system. Mild or Light cigarettes over the counter, and the good old boys via the doctor, and bring it in over 2 or 3 years that they get weaker and weaker.
Now the cigarette companies get to go back to advertising, as lets face it no one starts smoking because they see it on the back of a race car at 200 miles an hour, or because someone hits a little red ball into a small pocket.
You work this system to start in 5 years, 2 to 3 years to change to full prescription for cigarettes, and 25 years later, no one smoking. You task the smoking companies to promote and product other health care systems, or give them first shot at building schools or any other project they comes up that might make them money from the government.
That should be enough to keep the share holders happy, give them tax breaks, anything but the above system allows you full control and stops people smoking.
Lord only knows no one will see the sence in this, even when it is spelt out, but this is england where you can leave Uni and not be able to count to 10.
Health Care, the NHS and Smoking. You know what I mean, you see the ads as a cost of millions to stop you smoking, the packs they will send through the post the special people to assist you in quitting, lets try this on for size.
Part 1 - You make cigarettes a prescription only.
(This means no new smokers can start without a Doctors say so, and you guarantee the money and prices, you also stop underage smoking because of the prescription drug laws, and you give the police another easy target. Your smoking sir, can I see the prescription for those cigarettes.)
Part 2 – Every 6 months a chest x-ray is required and your doctor gives you another prescription for cigarettes, but if they see a spot, and catch cancer early, you have to quit and you cannot get any cigarettes legally again.
What this does it, brings all the money for cigarettes into the health care system. Allows you to control smokers and who is smoking and guarantees money into the health care system.
You could two part the system. Mild or Light cigarettes over the counter, and the good old boys via the doctor, and bring it in over 2 or 3 years that they get weaker and weaker.
Now the cigarette companies get to go back to advertising, as lets face it no one starts smoking because they see it on the back of a race car at 200 miles an hour, or because someone hits a little red ball into a small pocket.
You work this system to start in 5 years, 2 to 3 years to change to full prescription for cigarettes, and 25 years later, no one smoking. You task the smoking companies to promote and product other health care systems, or give them first shot at building schools or any other project they comes up that might make them money from the government.
That should be enough to keep the share holders happy, give them tax breaks, anything but the above system allows you full control and stops people smoking.
The End of the Year
Diane Abbott MP Slurps In House Of Commons - I just don't want people to forget this.
As an every week watcher of This Week I think she is worth every penny the BBC is paying her.
Perdictions for the new year...
DC - Will screw up through out the year and right through the election, but they will win the most seats, but not enough for power.
GB - He will fail, and in the end get pushed out just before conference later in the year.
Whats that other party? They will try and keep everything and try and keep power, but it will be a joke.
More than possible need for another election after it all falls apart late 2010.
As an every week watcher of This Week I think she is worth every penny the BBC is paying her.
Perdictions for the new year...
DC - Will screw up through out the year and right through the election, but they will win the most seats, but not enough for power.
GB - He will fail, and in the end get pushed out just before conference later in the year.
Whats that other party? They will try and keep everything and try and keep power, but it will be a joke.
More than possible need for another election after it all falls apart late 2010.
Wednesday, 30 December 2009
Jack Straw: The Tories are trying to buy the election
http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/jack-straw-the-tories-are-trying-to-buy-the-election-1852839.html
Right, how many tickets is he willing to give away? I can "Name one Conservative councillor" in Poole woh can tell you because of who controls this area they have had funding removed!
Jack is an Ass, and just wants to make sure everyone knows as much. Still he is set for life, he has everything ready for his retirement and a nice life living off what the public have provided.
Right, how many tickets is he willing to give away? I can "Name one Conservative councillor" in Poole woh can tell you because of who controls this area they have had funding removed!
Jack is an Ass, and just wants to make sure everyone knows as much. Still he is set for life, he has everything ready for his retirement and a nice life living off what the public have provided.
Tuesday, 29 December 2009
The Death Penalty Works
Now, as for proof of the above.
How many of you are thinking that you should try and smuggle Drugs into China? Not many I bet.
Thus, the threat of the death penalty has made you think about it and decided it would not be a good idea.
If it is not the reason stopping you, I suggest you buy some drugs and hop on a plane to China now....
How many of you are thinking that you should try and smuggle Drugs into China? Not many I bet.
Thus, the threat of the death penalty has made you think about it and decided it would not be a good idea.
If it is not the reason stopping you, I suggest you buy some drugs and hop on a plane to China now....
To reporters...
Here is a basic way to talk to any western leader, just keep it simple.
When they start on the Chinese about execution, you simple ask if it is Chinese law that he is being executed under, the answer has to be Yes, it is their laws that he broke. Keep in mind that all the answers to these questions are simple, and when they start to spout off, you must cut them off and remind them that the answer is smiple, is it their Laws that were broken, yes or no.
Ok, good, you have the basics down.
Then you ask so are the Chinese laws wrong?
If Yes, the we have a problem here don't we. They are Wrong in what they are doing, but just a second, what makes our laws right?
Don't they have less Drug Crime than we do? Wouldn't we be happy with their levels of drug crime?
From http://www.nationmaster.com/country/ch-china/cri-crime
The UK Numbers from the same site
Now, if they are serious about dealing with crime, the Chinese numbers should be the ones they are aiming form and thus their rules and laws must be part of why they have so much less crime than us.
So, again, are their laws wrong?
I think the Chinese have it right, and it this shows us what our politicians are really made of, nothing, as they do not have the spine to say they the Chinese have their laws, they do things in their way, and if someone is stupid enough to get caught, they will have to suffer the laws of that country.
We can only wish our laws could ever be that strong and respected.
When they start on the Chinese about execution, you simple ask if it is Chinese law that he is being executed under, the answer has to be Yes, it is their laws that he broke. Keep in mind that all the answers to these questions are simple, and when they start to spout off, you must cut them off and remind them that the answer is smiple, is it their Laws that were broken, yes or no.
Ok, good, you have the basics down.
Then you ask so are the Chinese laws wrong?
If Yes, the we have a problem here don't we. They are Wrong in what they are doing, but just a second, what makes our laws right?
Don't they have less Drug Crime than we do? Wouldn't we be happy with their levels of drug crime?
| 3.9 per 100,000 people | | [33rd of 46] |
The UK Numbers from the same site
| | 183,419 per 100,000 people | | [2nd of 46] |
Now, if they are serious about dealing with crime, the Chinese numbers should be the ones they are aiming form and thus their rules and laws must be part of why they have so much less crime than us.
So, again, are their laws wrong?
I think the Chinese have it right, and it this shows us what our politicians are really made of, nothing, as they do not have the spine to say they the Chinese have their laws, they do things in their way, and if someone is stupid enough to get caught, they will have to suffer the laws of that country.
We can only wish our laws could ever be that strong and respected.
David Cameron admits defeat
Well its just another day for David, with his speach that clearly makes out like he knows he is not going to win, and it will be a hung parliament after next years election.
Why do we not have any British leaders who are actually leaders, who work from the front and say what they mean, not the sap they think we need to hear.
Why do we not have any British leaders who are actually leaders, who work from the front and say what they mean, not the sap they think we need to hear.
British anger at China execution
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/8433704.stm
Just prooving my point here with the above.
The man was stupid, if you go to a country which has zero tolerance when it comes to drugs, well it their law and you have to abide by their law.
But Oh No, not the British.
This is why our streets are over run with Criminals, and you don't want to go out at night, and when you are a victim of crime you just can not be bothered to contact the police because they will not do anything about it as it is, "A waste of our time and yours." That is a direct quote from an officer in Reading at a business burglary, they just could not be bothered.
So here in the UK we talk about zero tolerance, and how we might have to do it, but what sort of zero tolerance would we do? The minute someone came up with a lame excuse, oh he in mentally handicapied, we would just let him go.
The individual was fit enough to get on a plane going to China, carry suite cases, buy or get bought for him a ticket. He was able to answer the questions at check in, hand over a passport, so he was fit enough to know, that going to China was a BIG move, with a BIG culture shock.
One less idiot in the food chain!
Just prooving my point here with the above.
The man was stupid, if you go to a country which has zero tolerance when it comes to drugs, well it their law and you have to abide by their law.
But Oh No, not the British.
This is why our streets are over run with Criminals, and you don't want to go out at night, and when you are a victim of crime you just can not be bothered to contact the police because they will not do anything about it as it is, "A waste of our time and yours." That is a direct quote from an officer in Reading at a business burglary, they just could not be bothered.
So here in the UK we talk about zero tolerance, and how we might have to do it, but what sort of zero tolerance would we do? The minute someone came up with a lame excuse, oh he in mentally handicapied, we would just let him go.
The individual was fit enough to get on a plane going to China, carry suite cases, buy or get bought for him a ticket. He was able to answer the questions at check in, hand over a passport, so he was fit enough to know, that going to China was a BIG move, with a BIG culture shock.
One less idiot in the food chain!
The UK, well they just don't get it.....
Thank you for reading, and a happy new year to you all, as well as a Merry Christmas...
Just a few thoughts...
Christians will never win this war with Terror because they want to be Christians. We hold our hands up and go we forgive you, Oh how good are well.
While the other side looks at us, laughs, and then they blow us up using some mentally ill person because guess what, they don't care!
To win this war, you have to do what they do, and be better at it..
Just a few thoughts...
Christians will never win this war with Terror because they want to be Christians. We hold our hands up and go we forgive you, Oh how good are well.
While the other side looks at us, laughs, and then they blow us up using some mentally ill person because guess what, they don't care!
To win this war, you have to do what they do, and be better at it..
Domain names for sale - Make Offer
I do not want mega money, I just want to get rid of these domain names.
- http://www.Network-Assistant.com http://www.Nullbox.org http://www.Arcade-Classics.net http://www.buygamescheap.net http://www.flash-arcade-games.net http://www.freeringtones4nokia.com http://www.netshopuk.com http://www.network-assistant.com http://www.network-faqs.com http://www.nullbox.org http://www.ringtones4nokia.com http://www.sex18to30.com http://www.simple-dns.org http://www.thejokesite.net http://www.topjokesite.com http://www.unemployedmp.com http://www.alienguidetoplanetearth.com http://www.buycdscheap.co.uk http://www.buydvdscheap.co.uk http://www.buygamescheap.co.uk http://www.buyiphoneapps.co.uk http://www.fix-my-it.co.uk http://www.fix-my-it.com http://www.gov-grants.co.uk http://www.networkfaqs.co.uk http://www.speculative-thinker.co.uk http://www.speculativethinker.co.uk http://www.speculative-thinker.com http://www.speculativethinker.com http://www.thepeterprinciple.co.uk http://www.cisco-network.co.uk http://www.cisco-support.co.uk http://www.singlenameserver.com http://www.thingsthatmakeyougogoogle.com http://www.dvds4trade.co.uk http://www.dvds4trade.com http://www.networkinfo.co.uk http://www.instituteofnanotechnology.com http://www.instituteofnanotechnology.co.uk http://www.toppokerclubs.com http://www.buyringtonescheap.com http://www.buyringtonescheap.co.uk http://www.buytunescheap.com http://www.buytunescheap.co.uk http://www.first4ringtones.com http://www.freeringtones4nokia.com http://www.mircosoft.co.uk
Friday, 25 September 2009
Mansion Tax
Right, so I have to listen to an MP with 7 houses defend a mansion tax, what the hell is an mp doing with 7 houses! I guess he never ripped off the tax payer eh?
Tax system and how you do it...
Right I figured I would provide some details, to show how easy it is;
Up to 10000 pay no tax
Up to 20000 pay 10% - Thus you pay 1000 tax
Up to 30000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 4000 tax
Up to 40000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 6000 tax
Up to 50000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 8000 tax
Up to 100000 pay 25% Thus you pay 23500 tax
Up to 250000 pay 30% Thus you pay 72000 tax
So the point is you pay on the total above 10000, so any idiot could do the numbers.
Everything above 250K is 30%, easy.
Income tax has never been so easy, and hey, I think most people could live with it.
Up to 10000 pay no tax
Up to 20000 pay 10% - Thus you pay 1000 tax
Up to 30000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 4000 tax
Up to 40000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 6000 tax
Up to 50000 pay 20% - Thus you pay 8000 tax
Up to 100000 pay 25% Thus you pay 23500 tax
Up to 250000 pay 30% Thus you pay 72000 tax
So the point is you pay on the total above 10000, so any idiot could do the numbers.
Everything above 250K is 30%, easy.
Income tax has never been so easy, and hey, I think most people could live with it.
Sunday, 13 September 2009
So here we are...
So Gordon says Sorry...
Me thinks it means nothing, and then again the laws at the time, nothing was wrong......
Me thinks it means nothing, and then again the laws at the time, nothing was wrong......
Places to go
alienguidetoplanetearth.com
buycdscheap.co.uk
buydvdscheap.co.uk
buygamescheap.co.uk
buyiphoneapps.co.uk
fix-my-it.co.uk
fix-my-it.com
gov-grants.co.uk
networkfaqs.co.uk
speculative-thinker.co.uk
speculativethinker.co.uk
speculative-thinker.com
speculativethinker.com
thepeterprinciple.co.uk
cisco-network.co.uk
cisco-support.co.uk
singlenameserver.com
thingsthatmakeyougogoogle.com
dvds4trade.co.uk
dvds4trade.com
networkinfo.co.uk
instituteofnanotechnology.com
instituteofnanotechnology.co.uk
buycdscheap.co.uk
buydvdscheap.co.uk
buygamescheap.co.uk
buyiphoneapps.co.uk
fix-my-it.co.uk
fix-my-it.com
gov-grants.co.uk
networkfaqs.co.uk
speculative-thinker.co.uk
speculativethinker.co.uk
speculative-thinker.com
speculativethinker.com
thepeterprinciple.co.uk
cisco-network.co.uk
cisco-support.co.uk
singlenameserver.com
thingsthatmakeyougogoogle.com
dvds4trade.co.uk
dvds4trade.com
networkinfo.co.uk
instituteofnanotechnology.com
instituteofnanotechnology.co.uk
Sunday, 30 August 2009
Network Help
While I am here, I might as well advertise a new business that has been started.
Network Help Ltd.
http://www.network-help.co.uk - If you are a small business and you are looking for IT support, please give this guy a call.
Thanks.
Network Help Ltd.
http://www.network-help.co.uk - If you are a small business and you are looking for IT support, please give this guy a call.
Thanks.
Food Bank...
I have an Idea.
I want to start a charity. A food bank. Where people who have the money to buy food can buy an extra can of beens or an extra can of soup and give it to the food bank, which will then give out shopping bags to those who do not have the money to buy their own.
Since my employer has decided it is easier not to pay me, and thus I am having to spend my savings to pay my rent council tax, petrol so I can work, food etc, I could do with a food bank.
They are a staple in Toronto, as it is so expensive to life there I know people with full time jobs who can only exist because of food banks.
Food Banks, soon to be in an English City near you...
I want to start a charity. A food bank. Where people who have the money to buy food can buy an extra can of beens or an extra can of soup and give it to the food bank, which will then give out shopping bags to those who do not have the money to buy their own.
Since my employer has decided it is easier not to pay me, and thus I am having to spend my savings to pay my rent council tax, petrol so I can work, food etc, I could do with a food bank.
They are a staple in Toronto, as it is so expensive to life there I know people with full time jobs who can only exist because of food banks.
Food Banks, soon to be in an English City near you...
Tax Revolt...
Just a thought, but since the council tax is so insane, I pay £100 a month for a 15x20 foot room. The local police never walk the streets and the children have no idea what school is, what is it that council tax goes on? It can not be the garbage collection, they don't do that around here, and as a single man I would rather pay per bag disposed of than what I am paying now.
Why doesn't someone organize a Tax Revolt?
Lets face it, we will have 20% VAT within 2 years, (This is guaranteed)
We are paying more to the EU, more to the unemployed, and collecting less because more people ar out of work, and we owe Billions.
How do you pay it back? You raise taxes, so %20 VAT is a given, it is going to happen.
(For those of you who are reading thing, remember the Title, Futire History, and I hold an almost 100% record of correctness)
We did it with fuel, lets do it with council tax or other taxes, otherwise your going to be broke, and broken and begging for a job and looking for a soup kitichen like the ones that are already being run in Reading.
Why doesn't someone organize a Tax Revolt?
Lets face it, we will have 20% VAT within 2 years, (This is guaranteed)
We are paying more to the EU, more to the unemployed, and collecting less because more people ar out of work, and we owe Billions.
How do you pay it back? You raise taxes, so %20 VAT is a given, it is going to happen.
(For those of you who are reading thing, remember the Title, Futire History, and I hold an almost 100% record of correctness)
We did it with fuel, lets do it with council tax or other taxes, otherwise your going to be broke, and broken and begging for a job and looking for a soup kitichen like the ones that are already being run in Reading.
So far so right...
So, as we read about how MP are now begining to come around to the view that they really should be able to do what they want, because the BBC is going to stand up for the idea that we public should not be told where and what their money is being spent on.
I find myself laughing.
The English are proving themselves as stupid as ever and are going to swallow whatever their MPs say, and the BBC will get away with doing whatever it likes.
Now, how do you feel about paying a license fee that enables the BBC to provide a Free TV station to the middle east.
How about all that Internet Content that you pay for, and they give away for Free?
People in the USA can watch BBC TV and not pay a dime. Yet, if you don't pay, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.
Wait a minute, if you want Sky TV, you have to Pay the BBC, but its via a Satellite, couldn't you turn off the BBC and thus get away with not paying the license fee?
Here is a free idea for Sky. Give people the option, with or without the BBC, and when you do the install disable the TV from receiving signals from anything othat that the Satellite, then surely the BBC could not force people to pay the license fee.
I for one never watch the BBC, if I want honest news I go else where, why watch the labour driven BBC?
I find myself laughing.
The English are proving themselves as stupid as ever and are going to swallow whatever their MPs say, and the BBC will get away with doing whatever it likes.
Now, how do you feel about paying a license fee that enables the BBC to provide a Free TV station to the middle east.
How about all that Internet Content that you pay for, and they give away for Free?
People in the USA can watch BBC TV and not pay a dime. Yet, if you don't pay, they come down on you like a ton of bricks.
Wait a minute, if you want Sky TV, you have to Pay the BBC, but its via a Satellite, couldn't you turn off the BBC and thus get away with not paying the license fee?
Here is a free idea for Sky. Give people the option, with or without the BBC, and when you do the install disable the TV from receiving signals from anything othat that the Satellite, then surely the BBC could not force people to pay the license fee.
I for one never watch the BBC, if I want honest news I go else where, why watch the labour driven BBC?
Monday, 24 August 2009
Silence is to deafening...
GB thinks that keeping his nose out of it, will keep him out of it.
Wrong...
Sad he is not able to think...
Ask yourself this question, he wrong to Colonel Kadaffi, so he must have known it was going to happen otherwise, how could he write the letter?
The press have not caught on yet, and again not asked the right questions.
They report, he wrote a letter, asking for a low key return, but how did he know the return was going to happen?
Wrong...
Sad he is not able to think...
Ask yourself this question, he wrong to Colonel Kadaffi, so he must have known it was going to happen otherwise, how could he write the letter?
The press have not caught on yet, and again not asked the right questions.
They report, he wrote a letter, asking for a low key return, but how did he know the return was going to happen?
Tuesday, 7 July 2009
One other thing...
Please excuse the randomness of this, but one other thing that will happen in this country.
Because those in power do not want to "act properly" they will adjust the rules in their favour, and this will mean they can avoid debate.
So, public funding for Political parties, and then they will Band the BNP. Much like they did in Spain, with ETA, ban them then no need to deal with the debate, just say they are illegal.
Since it will all be public money they will be able to skim off the top of that as well.
Because those in power do not want to "act properly" they will adjust the rules in their favour, and this will mean they can avoid debate.
So, public funding for Political parties, and then they will Band the BNP. Much like they did in Spain, with ETA, ban them then no need to deal with the debate, just say they are illegal.
Since it will all be public money they will be able to skim off the top of that as well.
While I think of it....
In regards to Gordo and his apparent smarts, I want to explain to you how, if you have a brain and you think, you could have figured out that killing the 10% tax rate was a bad idea.
Tax works like a ladder, the lower you are the lower you pay, the higher you are the more you pay.
So think of it like this...
40% Top rate..
30% lower step
22% little lower
10% even lower
No tax, ground floor.
Now if you remove the 10%, and lower the 22% to 20%, you still have a larger step up.
Effectively it is like removing a rung from the ladder...
Now, I don't know about you, but I do not like larger steps like that, not on ladders....
I could never suggest someone who does something like that has a brain.
Does the way I explain it make sense? Am I using words that are too long?
Tax works like a ladder, the lower you are the lower you pay, the higher you are the more you pay.
So think of it like this...
40% Top rate..
30% lower step
22% little lower
10% even lower
No tax, ground floor.
Now if you remove the 10%, and lower the 22% to 20%, you still have a larger step up.
Effectively it is like removing a rung from the ladder...
Now, I don't know about you, but I do not like larger steps like that, not on ladders....
I could never suggest someone who does something like that has a brain.
Does the way I explain it make sense? Am I using words that are too long?
Monday, 6 July 2009
Watch words...
Again, some basics for those of you who are reading this. There are watch words when listening to a politician, the most important is consensus.
When a politician uses this word it means they are devoid of ideas and need all the help they can get. David Cameron used this word when he started as leader, and he just rolled along with anything Labour did, and we the people got screwed.
Now Gordo is doing the same thing, devoid of idea he needs consensus, which means he needs other people to come up with ideas for him.
Now poor old David isn't really the best of thinkers, and the people around him, well they don't do much thinking for themselves. Lets face it, it has never been the point of a politician to actually think, or do much thinking, its to get into place, and do a little of this a little of that, and its a job that gives them the power to get a better job etc.
Gordo, well, again. At 16 he was in University, can you honestly look at his judgment and the manner of his thinking and see that this is a genius? Nope, but again the failing education system simply needed someone to promote from the area and he won the spot, not on merit, but simply because someone was needed for a story, political correctness has been around for years and years.
When a politician uses this word it means they are devoid of ideas and need all the help they can get. David Cameron used this word when he started as leader, and he just rolled along with anything Labour did, and we the people got screwed.
Now Gordo is doing the same thing, devoid of idea he needs consensus, which means he needs other people to come up with ideas for him.
Now poor old David isn't really the best of thinkers, and the people around him, well they don't do much thinking for themselves. Lets face it, it has never been the point of a politician to actually think, or do much thinking, its to get into place, and do a little of this a little of that, and its a job that gives them the power to get a better job etc.
Gordo, well, again. At 16 he was in University, can you honestly look at his judgment and the manner of his thinking and see that this is a genius? Nope, but again the failing education system simply needed someone to promote from the area and he won the spot, not on merit, but simply because someone was needed for a story, political correctness has been around for years and years.
Sunday, 5 July 2009
The Start....
This is for those of you who are a little too stupid to admit you are stupid, this is how the next 5 to 10 years are going to play out, some of this will be in detail some will be a little wild, but 80% of it will happen, and the people and the places are all real.
How do I know, its simple when you understand a few things.
Number 1, the education system in the United Kingdom has been failing 30 years, so now the cycle can not reverse itself, as you have people in charge who have been poorly taught, teaching people in the way, and its something that can not be reversed.
Example, when you have generations who have not worked, its not something that will ever change by giving them choice. If you do not have to move, you don't move.
Now....
The MP are going on Holiday soon, so nothing is going to happen with their expenses, big carpet, massive broom, its taken care of. They do not think the general public matter, so it will go away.
Noises will be made, and at most the long and short of it will be more money directly paid to them, and less claiming anything.
A little history for how I come to the conclusions that I am come to.
In the UK it is party politics, but it is still driven by class. So Labour hates the Conservatives and vice verse.
So Labour ministers, who have some brain cells, know they are going to loose the next election. So they will do their best to destroy the system.
Their only thoughts are to screw the incoming Conservatives. Their first thought is not for the country never would be never will be. Remember they are socialists, but when in power it everyone for themselves and if you going to lose it, why make it easy for the guy that takes it from you.
Note that even when writing letters Labour party people talk about the love for the party, NOT the love of the country they are apparently ruling.
Now as for the Conservatives, they are all about power, it is an expectation, thus you have MPs who when they speak their mind they look like real idiots. The people are jealous of me and my big house, etc...
They went to the right schools, they beat up on the smaller kids, why shouldn't they be in charge.
Again it is not for love of the country, you will never hear them say it, it is the party first.
A little history, if you want to know how I know all this, it has happened before. In Canada. Canada was ruined by two people, a primeminister and a finance minister. Brian Mulroney and David Wilson, they double teamed Canada just like Tony and Gordo.
David was smart enough not to take control after Brian, he ran like the others, leaving the party to the largest defeat in political history in the world.
In Canada we had another party to vote for, someone who would stand up.
In the UK, there is nothing. David Cameron is a product of the poor education system, same as those who are with him, full time public people, apparently it is a job, and so he thinks he know what to do.
Don't explain anything, someone might steal it (What steal good ideas for the country?) Steal ideas from his party, that would make the other party look good, but its the country that should come first.
Now, the election will be lost to labour, David Cameron will come in, and its going to be a mess. Hold a referendum? Well it will have all been passed and ratified so no point, this will be explained and the heat will be taken.
The pound will still be close to PAR with the Euro, and that means a year of it, and the ability to bring money in will limited, cuts will not be able to go deep enough, taxes will have to go higher, and this will not sit well.
Join the euro? That will be what Dave has to sell the people and he will. Its all labours fault, the money does not exist, we have to join the Euro.
The olympics coming up, it makes it easier, so we go Euro or accept it more for 2012 and convert 2013.
Unemployment will be around 2.5 things might look better but income from taxes will still be down.
Private health will be introduced on an insurance system, more and more people will find it is just easier to have health cover as the NHS will be limited on what it can do, spoon counter will be needed to make sure everything is running smoothly, but if you have the cash, no need to any of it, we do the op and cure all your ills.
To help bring down unemployment, the options will be limited, but David will come up with an idea like, guess what, Services, and the apparent regulation of Banking that looks like it has started to clean things up, will be loosened and we go at it again as before.
Now this is all 5 to 6 years away, so the new job will be held by people who have been pushed into university with limited skills and a very poor education in the first place, they will also be in debt to the eyeballs, so what do you do to pay off that debt? You take risk, you try and earn big money, and the ball rolls on.
In regards to the MPs and their spending, they will take the heat and increase their pay to 100K, it is possible that they might do 120 but then with the extras that they will give themselves they will be in the high earner tax bracket and they would not want that, they want to look like normal people so paying that much tax just will not do.
If it goes that high they will raise the upper limit so they are not part of it.
Second jobs will stay. This is a joke, it is a class system again, Labour know they are not worth employing, the others will be employed by their own, its a family thing.
Education, well it will not be turned around, it is beyond all that. We currently have teachers who teach children the easy way around things, and first and foremost is their rights. So by the age of 4 a child knows that if you ask it to do something like pick up a toy, you are violating its human rights.
Human rights taught at they age make you lazy, not well educated.
They will still teach only what they have to, count to 100 times tables to 12, and the basics, but not i before e etc, because it means work.
We have created a second generation of people who do not, nor feel that they actually have the need to work too hard.
(My experience)
When interviewing any English person for a job, the most important thing to him is overtime, what overtime do I get?
The basics should be for a job, if you are employed for 40 hours a week, then you can do your job in 40, but the English work only when they are earning what they feel they are worth, so they do not work until it is over time, this is why all buildings over run and no project ever finishes on time, it is built it British culture.
I have met Grads who could not speak clearly or describe how you use screw driver and a screw, this is the current level of education, so imagine that person teaching, what do you think that teachers pupils would turn out like? That is what we currently have.
More to come, as typing this has made me depressed.
How do I know, its simple when you understand a few things.
Number 1, the education system in the United Kingdom has been failing 30 years, so now the cycle can not reverse itself, as you have people in charge who have been poorly taught, teaching people in the way, and its something that can not be reversed.
Example, when you have generations who have not worked, its not something that will ever change by giving them choice. If you do not have to move, you don't move.
Now....
The MP are going on Holiday soon, so nothing is going to happen with their expenses, big carpet, massive broom, its taken care of. They do not think the general public matter, so it will go away.
Noises will be made, and at most the long and short of it will be more money directly paid to them, and less claiming anything.
A little history for how I come to the conclusions that I am come to.
In the UK it is party politics, but it is still driven by class. So Labour hates the Conservatives and vice verse.
So Labour ministers, who have some brain cells, know they are going to loose the next election. So they will do their best to destroy the system.
Their only thoughts are to screw the incoming Conservatives. Their first thought is not for the country never would be never will be. Remember they are socialists, but when in power it everyone for themselves and if you going to lose it, why make it easy for the guy that takes it from you.
Note that even when writing letters Labour party people talk about the love for the party, NOT the love of the country they are apparently ruling.
Now as for the Conservatives, they are all about power, it is an expectation, thus you have MPs who when they speak their mind they look like real idiots. The people are jealous of me and my big house, etc...
They went to the right schools, they beat up on the smaller kids, why shouldn't they be in charge.
Again it is not for love of the country, you will never hear them say it, it is the party first.
A little history, if you want to know how I know all this, it has happened before. In Canada. Canada was ruined by two people, a primeminister and a finance minister. Brian Mulroney and David Wilson, they double teamed Canada just like Tony and Gordo.
David was smart enough not to take control after Brian, he ran like the others, leaving the party to the largest defeat in political history in the world.
In Canada we had another party to vote for, someone who would stand up.
In the UK, there is nothing. David Cameron is a product of the poor education system, same as those who are with him, full time public people, apparently it is a job, and so he thinks he know what to do.
Don't explain anything, someone might steal it (What steal good ideas for the country?) Steal ideas from his party, that would make the other party look good, but its the country that should come first.
Now, the election will be lost to labour, David Cameron will come in, and its going to be a mess. Hold a referendum? Well it will have all been passed and ratified so no point, this will be explained and the heat will be taken.
The pound will still be close to PAR with the Euro, and that means a year of it, and the ability to bring money in will limited, cuts will not be able to go deep enough, taxes will have to go higher, and this will not sit well.
Join the euro? That will be what Dave has to sell the people and he will. Its all labours fault, the money does not exist, we have to join the Euro.
The olympics coming up, it makes it easier, so we go Euro or accept it more for 2012 and convert 2013.
Unemployment will be around 2.5 things might look better but income from taxes will still be down.
Private health will be introduced on an insurance system, more and more people will find it is just easier to have health cover as the NHS will be limited on what it can do, spoon counter will be needed to make sure everything is running smoothly, but if you have the cash, no need to any of it, we do the op and cure all your ills.
To help bring down unemployment, the options will be limited, but David will come up with an idea like, guess what, Services, and the apparent regulation of Banking that looks like it has started to clean things up, will be loosened and we go at it again as before.
Now this is all 5 to 6 years away, so the new job will be held by people who have been pushed into university with limited skills and a very poor education in the first place, they will also be in debt to the eyeballs, so what do you do to pay off that debt? You take risk, you try and earn big money, and the ball rolls on.
In regards to the MPs and their spending, they will take the heat and increase their pay to 100K, it is possible that they might do 120 but then with the extras that they will give themselves they will be in the high earner tax bracket and they would not want that, they want to look like normal people so paying that much tax just will not do.
If it goes that high they will raise the upper limit so they are not part of it.
Second jobs will stay. This is a joke, it is a class system again, Labour know they are not worth employing, the others will be employed by their own, its a family thing.
Education, well it will not be turned around, it is beyond all that. We currently have teachers who teach children the easy way around things, and first and foremost is their rights. So by the age of 4 a child knows that if you ask it to do something like pick up a toy, you are violating its human rights.
Human rights taught at they age make you lazy, not well educated.
They will still teach only what they have to, count to 100 times tables to 12, and the basics, but not i before e etc, because it means work.
We have created a second generation of people who do not, nor feel that they actually have the need to work too hard.
(My experience)
When interviewing any English person for a job, the most important thing to him is overtime, what overtime do I get?
The basics should be for a job, if you are employed for 40 hours a week, then you can do your job in 40, but the English work only when they are earning what they feel they are worth, so they do not work until it is over time, this is why all buildings over run and no project ever finishes on time, it is built it British culture.
I have met Grads who could not speak clearly or describe how you use screw driver and a screw, this is the current level of education, so imagine that person teaching, what do you think that teachers pupils would turn out like? That is what we currently have.
More to come, as typing this has made me depressed.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)