Mandy Says...

Right so Mandy says than many politicians say things off mic that they do not believe, it happens all the time, so does that mean that everything they say on mic they believe?

Is it not the case that when you know that you are not being recorded that you show your true self?

Poor reporting means that these questions will never be asked. You need to throw Mandy a curve ball, but the BBC would never ask them.

Question, when you are off Mic do you not let yourself speak as you feel?

History Lesson

History Lesson that the UK needs to learn - Once you have read this, then you should go and do a little digging about who Brian Mulroney and David Wilson are. They distroyed Canada, and ran. In the case of Brian Mulroney, much like Tony Blair, he as been to court a couple of times, and if not for one person staying in a country in which Canada can not get to him, he would be a convicted criminal. He was in it for the money, and what it could get him. David Wilson, his partner in crime of which part Gordon Brown has taken, distoryed Canada to the point of having to introduce a crippling tax, which distoryed Canada and only in the last few years has Canada been able to recover from.


I have explained this to various people, and they understand, what will not happen is you will not see this reported nor will you see it reported that there is a possibility of it happening here. The polls in Canada showed it was not going to be this bad, but it turned out to be.

The English are just generally not that bright, and not able to take in details, this is why the political class is able to pull the wool over their eyes so often. Also, the English buy this only two party thing, which is the biggest load of BS ever sold by the reporters of this country, or any pundit.

IF people voted for the 3rd party, the 3rd party would win, it is possible for them to win, it is not a "lost vote". Also AV, and other insane system which allow for more parties to get involved. Will you see anyone bring up the idea that this allows the BNP in? Nope, but it would. It would not just allow for LibDems, it would allow for Greens and BNP.

If you mentioned this to Gordo, what would he say? I would be willing to place money on the fact that Gordo would talk about banning the BNP, some how they would no longer have the right to voice their opinion.

What we have in this country, is a BBC which has reporters who are not restricted on what they can and will say, so certain things will never be questioned, and a public which is truly gullible and without the ability to think clearly, they are drunks and drug users who a simply willing to allow anyone direct them because it is easier than thinking for themselves.

The British public need something or someone to awaken them, but I fear what would happen.

Last Bunch of Blogs

If you had not guessed I was watching Question Time, and commenting on what was being said.

Now I guess I need to explain why I feel so upset, because simple language was not used and again the public, who have not been taught how to thing, could not figure out what was being said.


Now to explain, as Janet did so well, but because the English are overly stupid, it needs to be explained in an even more dumbed down way.

Labour is increasing Tax, or NI, which is something that is taken by your Employer directly out of your pay packet and given to the Government.

The Tories want to reverse this increase, or Not take this extra money from your pay packet.

Labour says the Tories are taking money out of the economy if they do not increase tax.

Question, is the Government the only economy? Surely if you leave more money with the people who earn it, the money is still in the economy?

This very basic response to Labour, your taking money out of the Economy, was never used, nor could the public see it.

To explain it in Baby terms; Everyone who works for Bob gets paid £10, from that they pay £3 in Tax. so they receive £7.

Now, after the increase, they receive £6.50.

Does this mean that £0.50 has been removed from the Ecomony?

I know one thing? It means that because I have £0.50 less to spend, I might not be able to save as much as I wanted to buy that new TV when I wanted to, it means I will have less to spend on food, and clothes.

Now, may I ask? Who is taking money out of the Economy?

Right, one last thing....

Governments DO NOT CREATE JOBS!

To explain, if I TAX you that extra £0.50, and then create a job, doing what, I know "smoking cessation officer" (That is a job that has been created under Labour, and ever NHS Hospital has at least 3) to do the paper pushing etc.

Does that make your public services better or more bloated?

Does the fact that in the NHS you have people dedicated to the counting of spoons (Again if you do a little digging you will find that this is true, job title is something to do with catering, but its cutlery manager, or something) Does that make you think, my taxes are being well spent? Or is it just possible, that your taxes are being used to make work?

Me, I think the English have had the system too long, it looks after you, so why should I work, I know at least 2 families who have 3 generations of people who have never worked, and they simply say, why should I, they pay me, I do what they want me to do, a course, a class, and they pay me more, why get up at 7am, to rush to a job when I know I don't need to.

Honestly, I am beginning to think they are right.

This country is Broken, and it needs a revolution to fix it...

David Cameron, Gordon Brown... Lost cause...

So, with all this Ashcroft crap, and of course Labour with their non dom money men as well, it just makes them all out to be the money grubbing losers we all think they are, and of course do not forget the expenses stuff as well.

Now surely you would expect a politician to think, hey, shouldn't we be trying to make the people trust us again otherwise, well, no one is going to believe what we say, and everything goes to pot...

But No, what we get is Labour calling the Tories idiots for not knowing what color underwear their Non Dom money man wears? (I put it like that because it just seem so stupid, everyone approved what was in the letter, even number 10, Now it 10 years later it all becomes a problem because they thought it meant something else, but it seems it didn't, yet its been ten years, now surely some committee could have challenged this a few years ago? made a little noise? Questioned him if he should still be a lord etc? Nope, guess it is just a fluke its right before an election)

The Tories are not spouting that Labour is run by the unions? Hmmm, that ain't new, and lets face it when you join a union you get the offer of an opt out form so your money does not go to labour, so ... This is news how?

Labour have Non Dom money men as well, and again this is news how?

News is, that without all the big bucks both parties would be running themselves out of shacks under the m25 because no one will give to criminals...

News is, that support and members of parties are drying up, because they are crooks.

News is not what is ever published in this country...

Because the education system has failed for too many years and we now have the poorly educated educating what will be poorest educated generation ever produced since a caveman once sat down his little boy and showed him that fire burns, and burnt himself to a crisp in the process.

The UK is going for the Darwin awards for countries...

None of the Above...

Interestingly enough someone said to me yesterday they thought they might just not vote. So I asked why, and they said, well they are all the same.


Now lets face it, they really are all the same, and given the chance to pick your pocket they would, but so would any of us with the power they have.

I suggested going and and voting but just writing None of the Above on the ballot and leaving it at that.

I hear all this talk about making it compulsory to vote, but the one thing they can not make you do is put a check mark next to any one of the names on the sheet.

I read all this stuff about AV, and again, they can not force you to select more than 1, they can not make you select 1, never mind two.

If you want people to vote, you have to actually do what you say you are going to do, and or explain it in depth.

I am going to speak slowly so you understand the question...

I am willing to pay any reporter that uses this phrase with any politician a very large amount of money.

Watching the Marr show this morning when it was asking that apparent women a question, she just rattled on, and did not answer the question. He needs to stop wait for her to finish then use the above.

Please, I am going to speak very slowly so you under stand the question. Do you understand?

Right, Now, Does not Labour have people of whom you do not know their tax status?

I am sorry I am going to have to stop you prattling on, as it seems you do not understand the question.

We need reporters who treat the politicians like they treat the public, with no respect at all.

Remember, they need the reporter more than you need them. Lets face it, there is plenty more news out there that people will watch, why talk to someone who will not listen to your questions and treat you with no respect.

We need reports to stop them in mid flow. Sorry, I we have turned off your mic because your obviously not listening or going to listen to my questions, nor answer them with any form of sense.

Can we get reporters who will do this? Please? Money on offer here?

Afghanistan

You gotta love this, and this is what we call POOR reporting...

So I am listening to iPM and Eddie is doing his bit, and really sets everything up nicely, but as most BBC reporters are not very bright, he just hits the guy on the head time after time, and doesn't bother hitting the nail.


We all know about afghanistan and its politics, curruption that makes our guys look like angels. Everyone knows this, Eddie mentions this a few time. Its all good. Now the killer, we are going to Pay the Tiliban to come over to ourside. Then he mentions even the Taliban has complained about curruption. (Wow it must be bad).

So now, what Eddie should have said, Isn't paying them off adding to the curruption? I mean it would be currupt of me to pay an MP to change his vote wouldn't it? Are we not just buying into the system? Throwing money at it and when its all gone, they might just change back?

Eddie, Eddie, think small, and give up on reading those questions on cards, think for yourself!!!

Its just as bad as interviewnging someone about schools and when they complain about getting the cane when they where young, you should say it worked didn't it? You don't do it again did you? Instead of just listening?

I mean we all know, a quick rap on the knuckles makes you think...

The Only Question to Ask

Right, here we go again.

As we all know the election will be held in May, we need to set out what questions the reporters need to ask. The first question that the public want answered is simple. "Will you promise NOT to raise Income Tax and VAT during your term in office?"

Thats it, no other question needs to be asked. Now we will not get any reporters smart enough to ask this question, or who will be able to put it in simple enough terms that it can be answered in one word.

Another question, "Will you regulate against further expenses and reduce your income to match the average wage of the general public?" This will never happen, but it is one of those questions you can ask a Tory and wait for them to ask "Whats the general public?"

In regards to the expenses problems the question that any reporter should be asking is "What do you do with your standard wage, which is 3 time that of the average wage, that means you have to claim for (Insert Item here)? Because most of the general public seem to be able to get away with buying that items without having expenses to claim it from.

But you will, nore is there, a reporter with the brain to ask that, when that is the easiest question to ask. Just think about it, someone earning 18K manages to by bath plugs, how is it they need to claim for them? What happened to their 3 times average wage?

Over taxed maybe?

Anyway, I want to know what questions you want put to the idiots in charge, the BBC is doing the same thing, but you know its going to be changed and monitored beyond anything, so no nasty questions or common sense questions will apart of it.